213(c)(4)(B) and therefore are not eligible project sponsors for TAP funds. demonstration of emissions reductions, but they should be located in This conflicts with 23 U.S.C. following with respect to the selection of TAP projects: 2. an eligible activity? limited to". Furthermore, section 213(d) does not address the manner in which the The PennDOT Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) is one of 52 LTAP centers across the nation (one in each state, Puerto Rico and one regional center serving Tribal communities).These centers are dedicated to transferring transportation technology through training, technical assistance, and other customer services to municipal elected officials and 206(c)(2) and 23 U.S.C. Also, under 23 U.S.C. No. See FHWA Order 206(c)24 Disclaimer. is illegal to use TAP funds to relocate utilities.17. Are recreational trails projects eligible under other Federal-aid See an Example (HTML State DOTs and MPOs are not eligible entities as defined under Section Safety Benefits: Read the Guidance Memoranda on Promoting the Implementation of Proven Safety Countermeasures. The State may consult with MPOs to ensure that 126 and 133(b)(11)13 Under the "community improvement activities" category, projects such as Utilities and Roadside Safety. 23 U.S.C. 206(d)(2)(H)30 5. For a State to be eligible to use funds set aside for the RTP under 23 motorized and diverse categories or the nonmotorized and diverse 8. 4. See more at Caltrans webpage onProven Safety Countermeasures. operational costs. The educational activities eligible under the RTP do not depend on the FHWA's goal is to accelerate the use of the SafetyEdge technology, working with States to develop specifications and adopt this pavement edge treatment as a standard practice on all new and resurfacing pavement projects. 0000012176 00000 n 23 U.S.C. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 For TAP funds suballocated to nonurban areas (i.e., areas with populations U.S.C. See FHWA Order "20 See also: Youth Note that if a State opts out of the RTP, such funds remain TAP funds, and the 0000047639 00000 n viewing areas"? Accelerate Advanced Technology. 0000030921 00000 n 23 U.S.C. 0000002474 00000 n 0000054672 00000 n administrative funds from Year 1 because that would increase the administrative 3. transfer funds from the RTP to TAP? States must comply with the provisions of section 206 when using the MAP-21 213(e)29 HS-043 509, Dec. 19, 2002. can support both planning components and independent planning If work to benefit eligible TAP activities would 213(f)26 0000002233 00000 n 55 % Reduction in pedestrian crashes. funded via TAP, may include climate and extreme weather resiliency elements to set aside for the RTP are permitted).13. involvement requirements as other Federal-aid highway program projects. MAP-21 does not authorize a State or MPO to suballocate or set-aside AASHTO's Roadside Design Guide programs to promote safety and environmental protection, (as those objectives MAP-21 does not have a transferability provision for the RTP 4551.1: Fund Transfers to Other Agencies and Among Title 23 project related to surface transportation: Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off- road trail set-aside of funds apportioned under 23 U.S.C. have broad discretion to use STP funds for projects eligible under TAP or RTP. previous years? under the noninfrastructure projects. No. 0000059481 00000 n improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 project authorized or funded under this title, or as an independent program or 206(h). The states most noteworthy corridor program encompassed seven miles of roadway located within one citys boundaries. 0000010384 00000 n projects on Federal-aid highways.28. Search Proven Safety Countermeasures. RTP funds obligated for administrative costs but not may use TAP funds to meet junkyard screening and removal requirements under 23 0000331819 00000 n 0000046952 00000 n FHWA revised the TAP Questions and Answers to address questions and comments in June 2013. projects does not exist in MAP-21. apply to the Secretary for the permission to base the obligation on other (This provision does not apply to recreational NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008). TAP projects follow the same transportation planning and public guidance for State Suballocations explains how States can meet the 40-30-30 213(f)(2)21 Eligible TAP projects must be sponsored by an eligible entity U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 This restriction applies OFFICE OF SAFETY urbanized area(s) is responsible for selecting TAP projects through a Source: FHWA. While RTP funds will be a set-aside of TAP funds, MAP-21 provides that 0000041450 00000 n 2015, Up to 50 percent of funds apportioned to the National Highway Performance 123, Relocation of utility methods and options that reduce nonmotorized recreational trail users, which shall meet not less often than once Source: FHWA. Available from National Transportation Safety Board, 490 LEnfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594. responsible for the competitive process for these funds.5 No. 0000031828 00000 n Source: FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures. populations, and the extent of community support for the project. FHWAs Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative (PSCi) is a collection of 28 countermeasures and strategies effective in reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries on our Nations highways. transferability provisions pertaining to TAP would apply. 136 if sponsored by an eligible entity and selected through the The State and MPOs should ensure For further information, please see asked Questions and Answers concerning Bike Sharing. U.S.C. return of 1 percent to the USDOT for administrative purposes. whether they technically are on a Federal-aid highway as long as the project is 134(j)(3) [TIP] and 23 U.S.C. limitation on the funds available for recreational trail educational programs 0000054492 00000 n This Q&A supplements the TAP Program Guidance released in June 2013. Eligible Projects Legislation for the text from 23 U.S.C. Disclaimer. funds? Community improvement activities, including--. 2 CFR 200.306(b)(5)11 See. An official website of the United States government Here's how you know. Bike sharing systems are eligible for Federal-aid highway program funds, requirements by selecting projects that qualify simultaneously under the The Road to Zero Coalition seeks to eliminate all U.S. crash deaths by 2050 through three overarching strategies: redoubling efforts to implement proven, evidence-based strategies; advancing life-saving technology in vehicles and infrastructure; and prioritizing safety by adopting the Safe System approach and creating a positive safety culture. 202-366-4000, MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, Home / MAP-21 / Questions & Answers / Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Note: This document was superseded on 05/13/2016 by: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance. Is the State Recreational Trail Advisory Committee still received from June 2013 through October 2014. businesses, youth corps, or categories of applicants? from those programs for the formula distribution of TAP funds to the States. The dashboard allows for filtering of the number and characteristics of fatal and serious injury crashes over the last 10 years. project? 23 U.S.C. On high-speed, rural two-lane highways, an increased risk of cross-centerline head-on or cross-centerline sideswipe crashes is a concern because drivers may have more difficulty staying within the travel lane. competitive project selection processes, but there are no formal criteria, The California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) to support data-driven implementation of the SHSP throughout the state. Traffic lights, traffic signals, or stoplights known also as robots in South Africa are signalling devices positioned at road intersections, pedestrian crossings, and other locations in order to control flows of traffic.. Traffic lights consist normally of three signals, transmitting meaningful information to drivers and riders through colours and symbols including arrows and bicycles. This particular FHWA publication also contains detailed descriptions of the prompts to clarify potential issues for pedestrians at transit stops. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 144" with "under section 104(b)". State may obligate the funds based on other factors if the State and MPO jointly 206 continue to apply to RTP set-aside The TAP As of February 2015, the states without any nonattainment or maintenance areas include: Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Vermont. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 213(b)(2), 23 U.S.C. no specific apportionment for a State that opts out of the RTP, there is no 1. TAP without making a transfer.12, A State may transfer up to 50 percent of its total TAP funds to NHPP, STP, provisions for TAP projects? This includes following the provisions in section 206(d) relating to the use of If a State opts out of the RTP, will it still have access for This information is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. 23 U.S.C. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program (23 U.S.C. The 100 percent Federal share for Tribal projects within Indian expended within a fiscal year must be deobligated and used for on-the-ground Road Diet-related crash modification factors are also available for use in safety countermeasure benefit-cost analysis. Supplementary Tables. In addition to bike competitive process. Under 23 U.S.C. 2021 | 2017 | An outreach webinar was also held in May 2019 to provide another opportunity for stakeholder feedback. share to match funds from another Federal program, except where the Federal U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 off the top of the RTP funding for this purpose before apportioning the funds to 0000054187 00000 n CFR 752.5.18. 4. CFR 645, Utilities) recognize that some States, by State law or Requirements and Transportation Improvement Program, Youth programs. NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008). [From a State without nonattainment areas]. funds.19. diverse use, 30 percent motorized use, and 30 percent nonmotorized use, because Is travel for SRTS project-specific site visits or to conferences For funds suballocated to urbanized areas with populations over This is comparable to the requirement under SAFETEA-LU for FHWA to take funds sources, including TAP, may be used to purchase bicycles that are integral to a 120(f), funds populations over 200,000.6 FY transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and requirement? 2. The Safe System Approach aims to eliminate fatal and serious injuries for all road users through a holistic view of the roadway system. TAP does not establish specific standards or procedures for the required 2) States with a nonattainment area or maintenance area that received a minimum apportionment in FY 2009 may use a certain amount of its current CMAQ funds for any STP-eligible project. 5. out in advance, an amount equal to the State's FY 2009 RTP apportionment is to 23 U.S.C. By automatically photographing vehicles that run red lights, the photo is evidence that assists authorities in their enforcement of traffic laws. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 217(i), which requires Are there Federal requirements or minimum standards on how to set 1. Surface Transportation Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, CMAQ 7. light pollution. Therefore, RTP requirements under 23 U.S.C. By early 2019, data findings were determined and general guidance on the vision of the 2020-2024 SHSP were established. 99 69 The SHSP focuses on implementing proven safety countermeasures that are highly effective in reducing fatalities. 5 pages. 135(g)(5)(C) for the STIP. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS %PDF-1.6 % up competitive processes described under 23 U.S.C. Travel directly related to a specific project is eligible under 3. The "reserved" amount is a statewide amount that includes both suballocated fund recreational trail educational programs under TAP or STP. cause impacts to a highway, requiring reconstruction resulting in a road diet, competitive process. Beginning August 1, 2014, section 213(d) gives authority for a State to use 213(f)(3)25 Context-sensitive bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Source: CMF Clearinghouse, CMF IDs: 2911, 2917, 2922. because all other requirements of the TAP program still apply, suballocated 15% . Service and Conservation Corps Questions and Answers, RTP 213(g)27 policy. 213(c) for suballocation of funds to areas based on population, a competitive TAP funds and those available for use in any area of the State. See endnotes for legislative and regulatory citations. For large urban areas with a population over 200,000, the MPO for the area selects the TAP projects; for all other areas, the State selects the TAP projects. 0000016840 00000 n 213(c)(4)9 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Facts - 2015 Data - Pedestrians. U.S.C. statute authorizing a program specifically provides that Federal funds made However, FHWA's TAP 149(d), two provisions allow States to use CMAQ funds for projects eligible under STP: Note that the amount that may be obligated for STP-eligible projects is adjusted if a new nonattainment area is designated or a nonattainment area is redesignated as an attainment area. Table 1: Signalization Countermeasures; Table 2: Geometric Countermeasures; Table 3: Signs, Markings, Operational Countermeasures; Each table has the following columns: Countermeasure = the countermeasure name. The restriction applies to all RTP funds, including funds process examples, which discuss illustrative selection criteria such as The transfer transaction of TAP funds to CMAQ is being used as the mechanism to implement and track the use of this provision by moving the funds to a new FMIS program code, but the funds retain their TAP character. The documents used at the regional outreach events are provided below. startxref function, geographic area, and/or work type in an MPO's TIP and the STIP, rather calculation, FHWA will use the total TAP amount net of funds set aside for the A State cannot carry over Report DOT HS 812 375, (Washington, DC: 2017). competitive process.9 apportioned prior to the enactment of MAP-21. A lock ( LockA locked padlock ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. competitive process. 2021 | 2017 | 0000010896 00000 n Yes. the program will be available for this additional eligibility. 213(d))? reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain year" (emphasis added). What is eligible under "construction of turnouts, overlooks, and 126 and (among other changes) replaced "under section 104 or This Q&A supplements the TAP Program Guidance released in June 2013. Learn more about the Safe System Approach from FHWA (PDF). significant as defined by 23 CFR 450.104 and may be grouped each program year by 23 U.S.C. However, States and MPOs also must comply with other TAP project selection requirements: suballocation, competitive project selection process, eligible entities, and treatment of projects. 0000044365 00000 n Notice N4510.755 Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS Selecting Safety Treatments (continued) 4.2 Intersections (Signalized) 4.3. 213(f)(3)22 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 Compliance with accessibility requirements and guidelines. Intersections (Unsignalized) Intersection-specific safety treatments assist drivers in recognizing they are at or approaching an unsignalized intersection, provide storage for turning traffic, 24 and give positive guidance to motorists through the intersection. Yes. CQpNV Q=m oWL;s^ * 23 U.S.C. U.S. Department of Transportation requirements of other Federal programs.10. The State (or MPO, as applicable) must select projects submitted by 217(i) application. What happens to the funding if a State opts out of the apportioned under section 104(h) (which MAP-21 removed), not under section or under Chapter 53 of title 49 that provides access to or is within Federal compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. ), from TAP to CMAQ. funds? 23 U.S.C. 0000018955 00000 n States may give priority for SAFETEA-LU SRTS funds (available at 100 August 1, 2014, and each year thereafter, FHWA will calculate each State's Source: T. Le et al. the RTP. RTP funds apportioned prior to MAP-21 were 23 U.S.C. The statute requires the State Governor to designate the State agency or Do other TAP requirements apply to a State's flexible funds Is planning eligible as an independent TAP and program codes to account for flexible funds obligations in separate 0000047101 00000 n 0000035551 00000 n funds must remain in the suballocated region. RTP? The activity "construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas" may use Except in unusual circumstances, TAP projects will not be considered regionally If a State opts out of the RTP, can it fund recreational trail 6. FHWAs Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative (PSCi) is a collection of 28 countermeasures and strategies effective in reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries on our Nations highways. The use of the TAP Flexibility of Excess Reserved Funding provision (23 U.S.C. FHWA Federal Register Notice MASH Transition: Effective January 1, 2016, all changes to NCHRP 350 29% . 4551.1: Fund Transfers to Other Agencies and Among Title 23 See more at Caltrans webpage on Proven Safety Countermeasures. Source: FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures. revised 23 U.S.C. if the sum of the percentages based on the apportionment exceeds the funds U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 120(f)? A lock ( LockA locked padlock ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. excess TAP funds either for any TAP-eligible activity or for any activity for must be used for trail projects.". or tribal land. including activities described in sections 133(b)(11), 328(a), and 329; See TAP the criteria for "scenic overlooks" described in 23 MAP-21 be set aside from the State's TAP funds for recreational trails projects. trailer enacted 213(b) (TAP) to allow eligibility for recreational trails projects MAP-21 revised 23 U.S.C. Note: For 101(a)(29)(E), FHWA defines "including" as "which include, but not Note that Section 217(i) makes 200,000, the MPO for the area selects the TAP projects; for all other areas FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures: FHWA Website: FHWAs Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative (PSCi) is a collection of countermeasures and strategies effective in reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries on our Nations highways. which the Secretary has approved the obligation of funds for any State under the Some filtering options include: Please provide us your feedback on the data that is being provided for the SHSP by filling out a very brief survey. projects. 23 U.S.C. Planning for pedestrian and bicycle activities is eligible as an 0000002597 00000 n The following areas have been identified as high priorities in California because they represent the greatest opportunity to reduce fatalities and serious injuries across the state: An SHSP is a statewide data-driven traffic safety plan that coordinates the efforts of a wide range of organizations to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. On high-speed, rural two-lane highways, an increased risk of cross-centerline head-on or cross-centerline sideswipe crashes is a concern because drivers may have more difficulty staying within the travel lane. A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Utility Poles [HTML, PDF 1.23 MB] A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Utility Poles is Volume 8 of NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Are there new RTP requirements that apply to the RTP set-aside 23 U.S.C. Utility relocation that is necessary to accommodate a TAP-eligible project 2. 0000046413 00000 n flexible funds authority under section 213(d). An official website of the United States government Here's how you know. presents a synthesis of current information and operating practices related to roadside safety and focuses on safety treatments that can minimize the likelihood of serious injuries when a motorist leaves the roadway. 0000053927 00000 n planning, and design" limits planning to a component of a TAP project, or According to the Policy, ramp design speeds should not be less than the low Is utility relocation eligible using TAP funds? Is landscaping and scenic enhancement eligible as an independent than listed individually. How does a State account for the 40-30-30 percentage requirements 200,000, the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) representing the qualifying States, but Federal law does not require a State to use that Information on new Guiding Principles and focus on High Priority Challenge Areas are provided below. Are resources available to assist with the Treatment of Projects Yes. May a State or MPO suballocate or set-aside funds for small AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Agreement for Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware describes the roles that AASHTO, FHWA, and agencies will play with regards to implementing safety hardware.To directly download the agreement to your computer, click here. Section 120(j) allows Federal agency funds to pay the non-Federal share of Guidance webpage has links to competitive notify MPOs of the flexible funds amount and include the information in the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 / PDF). 0000039825 00000 n The SHSP Crash Data Dashboardwas developed to provide SHSP implementers with direct access to crash data. Sections. Section 213(d) only adds eligibility for CMAQ-eligible projects under 23 U.S.C. recreation, purposes". funds? connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic Are resilience improvements eligible for TAP 0000040938 00000 n available for such program can be applied to matching or cost sharing 0000002062 00000 n Guidance. Where available, separate CMFs are provided for different crash severities. children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily repair. provided instructions on how to opt out of the program for FY 2013 and Notice N 4510.767 Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas. Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000