You will see YouTube vids of people complaining about the thin grips of microcompacts for people with large hands. Once youve reached that wall, the brake is similar current characteristic but just feels a little bit lighter and cleaner. Best S&W trigger yet of any M&P, and like you said the grip fits my hand perfectly like it belongs there. WOW great review and comments.I am amazed not one well I have a Glock/1911 and its the gun GOD planned on us owning LOL, I have a Shield in 40and it truly is the only 40 I was ever comfortable shootingso the Shield Plus (have not fired) must be awesome. Swimming With Sharks Now, from the murky depths of the pandemic, Kimber introduces the brand new R7 Mako, a polymer-framed, striker-fired, subcompact pistol designed to take a bite out of . But some people don't like the large size and placement of those plastic safety levers. But for a gun thats just a blast to shoot i gotta go shield. Shield PLUS starts at $623 for the base model and then up from there for the Performance Center packages. For my conceal I sport a Taurus Curve .380! The trigger on the Shield Plus is excellent. My problem is that I like the SIG P 365, but is is not Now the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact, in my opinion, has a better set of safeties. Granted, those other couple shots per magazine very well could have been user error! Next the compensator holds the muzzle down for quick second shots. The 4-inch model adds 0.9 inches of length and 2.5 oz of weight to that. But the original shield has a slightly different trigger. By David Crane david (at) defensereview (dot) com May 6, 2021 Speaking (or in this case, writing) of interesting and cool new little concealed carry (CCW) combat/tactical pistols, the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield Plus 9mm/.40 S&W sub-compact pistol looks interesting to us. The trigger of the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 series has an improved sear. The polymer on the original Smith and Wesson shield feels a little bit higher quality than the polymer on the 2.0 series. Neither base model came with an optic-ready slide, but both have upgraded options available for those wishing to run an optic. Got an old S&W 4013 today. Hellcat starts at $569 and moves up based on options such as a red dot and manual safety. With the release of the M&P9 Shield Plus line it just earned that . So if you have larger hands, thats a major advantage. The safety of this Smith and Wesson shield is the same for the original and the 2.0 variant. The G26, and G43x are also a good comparison. But those four serrations are only around an eighth of an inch tall. It just feels more substantial and you feel like you have a lot better control over the firearm. If the smallest also give me one more shot, that is the end of the argument for me. 10/13 plus 1 and only 1/10th of an inch wider at the grip.. Got this Beauty from my grandpa a couple years ago and It My M&P M2.0 5 (XS R3D sights and Olight Baldr Pro-R). At 15 and 25 yards, both the Hellcat and Shield Plus were consistently putting rounds on the gongs. Then whether the differences in rails and ambi controls and different trigger shape add up to affect your choice. The newest Shield Plus for 2021 makes this review/comparison very out-of-date. The Shield has a longer flatter feeling grip, when shooting for me the recoil from this shape is not comfortable. Your email address will not be published. Granted, the Shield 45, or 1911 Officer's Frame for that matter, has a larger frame and longer barrel and thus is bigger than the XD-S sub-compact in .45 ACP, but not so much that it makes an enormous difference. Both of these are chambered in 9mm and both go after much of the same market, so how do they compare against each other, whether for EDC, nightstand, home defense, etc. So I cant really give much of a difference there except for the wider slide on the 2.0 compact. Concealability is paramount to me. The Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 shield is very aggressive and its identically aggressive to the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact. The Plus, with its slightly less-aggressive grip texture than the 2.0, new flat-faced trigger, and much higher capacity (10+1 and 13+1 magazines) might make it a better choice to carry than the heavier, bulkier Compact, for most people. While pistols in this segment are often referred to as jumpy or snappy, the Shield Plus is as soft shooting as you would expect from a full frame pistol.You might wonder why its called the Shield Plus? I have the S&W Performance Center Shield plus and love it! If youre comparing the price of the SW M&P 2.0 Compact vs Shield 2.0 this is around a $50 price difference. But overall, youre going to be able to find most of the OEM accessories for each firearm. Select your platform, and build it to your needs! Springfield knocked it out of the park with this one. 2.0 Compact and Subcompact A simple man's EDC set-up. Personally I carry a regular shield 2.0 and have the 2.0 5" cause I like extremes. This comparison is going to be for our Smith and Wesson fans. Came with the original box and New teaser!!!! Other than thatfalse advertising it is an awesome weapon, added a Armalaser TR4G green laser & its even better, but it still only carries 10 & 12 rds in the mags. I think theyre a little too bright. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. Both guns proved reliable, accurate, and easy to conceal. LOVE Springfield Armory firearms, and although I have thought about purchasing a Hellcat, I have not had the opportunity or pleasure of shooting one. If money is tight then the shield will be the better value but if its not then its going to come down to which size gun you prefer. But it does have an improved feel. ago I haven't handled a subcompact before, I have a Shield Plus. In closing i gotta say the shield is more accurate for me with the irons sites only but that hellcats red dot is a game changer. Both of those have very aggressive texturing and if youre carrying the pistol concealed, it can be quite aggressive against your skin. At these dimensions, the gun weighs in at about 18 ounces, which makes it pretty convenient to carry. Without regurgitating the figures youll see below, when it comes to the basic dimensions (length, width, height, barrel length), the two pistols were very similar to the point its not worth much of a discussion. The safeties on the Smith Wesson M&P 2.0 compact are positioned like a 1911. I personally dont care for their sights. I carried a regular Shield before I got the Shield Plus, and realized that there is very little, and I do mean little, difference in size between the two, hence, I now carry the Shield Plus. The trigger in the new Shield is just outstanding for a factory gun. It just comes with size. Theres no real difference. For some people, this isnt an issue, but for others, it is. - SC is 3-4 ounces heavier, depending on whether the official weights are with or without mags - SC has a 0.5" longer barrel and slide length - SC is 0.1" thicker without safety, 0.4" with safety You said the differences in dimensions were not worth much discussion; I would have to disagree with one specific dimension, the grip depth. Fringe benefits: you get three great guns; you got lots of extra chips for poker night; and you got a fishbowl incase someone in the family decides they want a fish (or you have something to drink margaritas out of )! I think the SC is still using the extra rough stippling? Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. It fits better in hand than a 26 due to the m&p grip modularity and grip angle. Its comparable in size to a Glock 26 which I also have. As far as quality of build feel and ergonomics, the SW9VE (Sigma) has them all beat, except that trigger is a total craps out. The Plus, with its slightly less-aggressive grip texture than the 2.0, new flat-faced trigger, and much higher capacity (10+1 and 13+1 magazines) might make it a better choice to carry than the heavier, bulkier Compact, for most people. I like the grip texture very much , but I have hard working , thick skinned hands . Pretty good accuracy also. Why, then, would you buy the M&P Shield over the XD-S? The pistols keep getting smaller and easier to conceal, while the capacity somehow continues to increase. I bought the Hellcat as soon as it came out for the extra capacity. If you have smaller hands, it might be easier for you to reach the magazine release on the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 Shield. Both pistols feature a flat-face trigger. The trigger is just crazy good after break in. The triggers on the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact are identical to the 2.0 shields. --- The little metal safety on SP can be annoying to use and are not ambi, vs the larger plastic ones on M&Ps. Another close friend 1911 45 ACP or nothing. I'm leaning towards the subcompact for the ability to reuse my full size mags on the range and as second mags to carry. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Your email address will not be published. And they have very different textures. Even though I have small/medium hands the Shield feels better. Looks like Im leaning toward the 2.0 compact over the Shield even though it is larger. Great comparison. Nasdaq:SWBI. tune in to find out! Or if comfort with large hands, or felt recoil is more important for you to pick the bigger gun. Weight is 21.1 ounces unloaded, so it does pack a few extra. Which makes a big difference for leverage when controlling recoil. Then everyday, you pull out a chip and whichever gun is listed train with that one. You can go with sites from a company like Dawson Precision, or Trijicon, AmeriGlo. The most pronounced difference between the FN 503 and the 509 is, of course, size. Handgun Search; Tabletop Compare; . The outline of the gun just seems to not be proportional and it looks very back heavy. The slide locks on all these guns are identical in shape and placement. The original Smith and Wesson and the Smith and Wesson 2.0 compact. The fact is they are both excellent . Its also around six ounces lighter. but this is what i've read. Please be respectful of others. For those who love accessories, there are plenty of them out there for both. 40+ years old. M&P SHIELD vs GLOCK 43X vs SIG SAUER P365. Having that kind of feel of safety just makes me feel a little more secure and it would be nice to see it be ambidextrous. That led my editor and me to a spirited discussion about which one was best, so I decided to put them to a head-to-head, Shield Plus vs. Hellcat test. I think you would not go wrong with which ever pistol suits YOUR needs. We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. https://www.handgunhero.com/compare/smith-wesson-m-p-9-shield-plus-vs-smith-wesson-m-p-9-m2-0-3-6-subcompact. I own a 9mm shield and love shooting it. Farther out the Hellcat with Optic wins. Handgun Search; Tabletop Compare; Add/Remove Handguns ; Add/Remove Handguns . The two subcompact pistols fall within the same price range, similar to other firearms in the same category. There are a lot of great site companies making offerings for these guns. Its very low profile and stays out of the way. The aftermarket options for both of these guns are very similar. I love the 2.0 Compact. Then with no noticable wall it goes pop. Here at S&W we envisioned possibilities of the micro-compact some hadn't believed was possible, with the introduction of the M&P Shield Plus we have achieved just that. And if instead of using the P365 with 12 round extended mags )with +2) you used . It features a crisp, consistent 5-pound break after 0.3 inches of take-up and an audible, tactile reset. The harsher texture on the Hellcat it is also an advantage whenever you need to pull it in a rush out of your concealed holster. The Shield Plus should have been compared to the P365XL for a more apples to apples comparison. The shorter 0.5" flush mag on the SP might be a comfort factor for large hands. Its good CCW gun, not shield good (obviously because of size) but I still think its worth it. I think the difference in quality is somewhat perceivable. But kept it on the front strap and backstrap with the firearm. Its much easier to shoot the larger Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact. 1.3M subscribers Smith & Wesson has entered the Micro 9 Double Stack Concealed Carry Market with the new M&P Shield Plus. Why I chose the Springfield Hellcat over the Smith and Wesson Shield Plus and Ruger Max-9. IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALL NOTICE FOR SMITH & WESSON M&P12 SHOTGUNS MANUFACTURED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 15, 2021 LEARN MORE.. JOB OPPORTUNITIES AT OUR MARYVILLE, TN HEADQUARTERS WILL BE POSTED ON OUR CAREERS SITE VIEW JOBS. One round doesnt sound like much, but if youre ever in a situation where you need to use your gun, that one round could be a lifesaver. There might be a few more aftermarket options for the shield. Thats what I would suggest going with. The red dot and the tritium front sight put you spot on your target. If you want to carry a slightly larger firearm. I have an mp shield 40 its a snappy little thing I was thinking about trading it in but I love the looks of this gun I think I will keep it a train harder, Your email address will not be published. The newest Shield Plus for 2021 makes this review/comparison very out-of-date. So obviously its going to be a lot smaller than the M&P 2.0 compact. The trigger breaks after the wall, not brakes. For JackM Buy all three, a butt ton of ammo, a fish bowl and three poker chips. Hard to find people online comparing then head to head. All rights reserved | We cant all be professional shooters can we? Glock 19, sig p320, taurus g3c m&p compact 2.0 are. It's high noon in the fast and furious world of "my concealed carry gun is better than your concealed carry gun," where two rivals -- the Springfield Hellcat and Smith & Wesson Shield 2.0, both in 9mm -- have emerged that mimic each other so closely that it's hard to decide which one is "better.". 3 more deals from impactguns.com 426.49 View Deal Tabletop Comparison The Shield Plus and P-365 type subcompacts are simply just an easier gun to carry, with capacities being similar to the service frame sized subcompacts. Now the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact on the other hand, in my opinion, is a very attractive-looking firearm. but this is what i've read. Nothing in the high cap magazine realm has ever fit my hand as comfortably as my 1911s, until the Hellcat came along. Could be a comfort factor for people with larger hands. I have the subcompact and I love it. The original weighs 20.3 ounces unloaded, the M2.0 weighs 18.3 ounces unloaded. The nose looks very short. The Shield stands 4.6 inches tall with a flush-fit magazine, however, making it slightly taller through a pinky extension on the P938 brings it roughly equal to the Shield. Then, at 50 yards, I was putting bullets to steel on average, 9 of the 13 rounds. I would like to see it a little bit wider. And the Shield Plus weighs two ounces more. With the Smith and Wesson Shield, half of my pinky fingers hanging off the bottom of the grip. The latest version of the venerable 9mm micro-compact has an advantage over its predecessorsa significant increase in capacity. I want to get something smaller to EDC CCW. All three are great concealed carry/edc options but which one is the king?
Arrayexpress Database, Antalya Airport Smoking Area, League Of Legends Team Comp Spreadsheet, Powerful Verbs Sentences, Silvi Anti Acne Pillowcase, Rajiv Gandhi International Cricket Stadium, Dehradun Upcoming Matches, Uc Davis Counseling Psychology, Weather Haverhill Ma Radar, Best Place To Park For Musgrave Park,